The document’s admirers must contend with slavery
Philadelphia Inquirer – Jan. 13, 2011
Congress’ reading of the Constitution last week seemed like a fairly benign way to pander to the majority’s tea-party base. It wasn’t supposed to involve any debate. But House Democrats, adapting quickly to their new minority role, managed to find a way to take issue with the event.
It turned out that the Republican leadership had chosen to omit the Constitution’s references to slavery. Claiming “whitewashing,” some Democrats were able to score points in this bizarre channeling-the-ancestors contest, which has become a popular pursuit among Washington politicians and Supreme Court justices. Continue reading “A constitutional battle across the generations”